Tudor Oyster 1966

DSCN8895

DSCN8896This is not a Rolex! Every time I see Tudor advertised for sale, the headline is something like “Rolex Tudor”. This annoys me. Tudor is a separate product and although both come under the same parent company and Tudor came about 40 years after Rolex, the two are aimed at two different markets.

A brief history of Tudor.
By virtue of its Oyster Case, Rolex had cemented itself as a leader in the upper mass market, competing in the marketplace with Omega, Certina, Longines, Zenith etc.

Thirty eight years after Rolex, Hans Wilsdorf started Tudor. To make Tudor stand out in a cluttered market, Rolex cases where used. The movements used were the standard but brilliant ETA’s, manuals and automatics. The in house Rolex automatics of the 40’s through to the 70’s were not a patch on their DSCN8900competitors, watchmakers were gleefully bagging out the Rolex as “rubbish”, but the Oyster Case was its great virtue. So, the Tudor enjoyed instant success with the Oyster case and good ETA movements…….A better watch than Rolex, some would say and has actually been referred to as the thinking man’s Rolex.

Over the years Tudor moved further and further away from its big brother until the present day where it bears no resemblance and has a clear direction of its own.

This model.

DSCN7371This model is classic Tudor, a 1966 model (twenty years into this young company’s history). It uses a basic Ebauche ETA 1100 manual wind movement, no date, housed in a Rolex Oyster case. And, like all Tudor Oysters it lets it be known loud and clear having “ORIGINAL CASE BY ROLEX GENEVA” etched into the back along with the Rolex crown emblem. The crown logo is also seen on the winding crown.

So, although the Tudor may not have the pedigree of Rolex or have some of the world’s most desirable models, that isn’t to say it should be snubbed. It is a unique watch, basic but a top performer that holds an important place in watchmaking history.

Advertisements

About robswatches

I’m a horoligical “petrol head”! I love classical mechanical watches, not because they tell me the time, I can get the time from cheap quartz watches, my computer, phone, microwave or just about anywhere. I’m interested in the movements of watches, the aesthetics of case design and their construction, the history and the simple thrill of watching tiny, beautifully finished wheels, pinions and other parts turning and oscillating and marvelling at the craftsmanship that created it.
This entry was posted in Rolex, Tudor and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s